Skip to main content

Not-So-United Nations

Yesterday was the big day at the United Nations, big enough to fill most of the news coverage for the rest of the day. Some called the report of Chief U.N. Weapons Inspector Hans Blix to be "shocking", but you honestly can't be all that surprised by a guy who doesn't want to be held accountable for starting a war, whether he might personally be for it or not. I thought he gave a pretty honest and straightforward report, and maybe the only real surprises of the day were the rounds of applause following the statements made by the representatives from France and Russia. Anti-war seems to be a popular stance right now, and if it weren't for things like guns and missiles and armies, especially in the hands of people who might use them, I think that even the strongest hawks would agree that not having wars is a good thing. Too bad the world doesn't necessarily work that way, and some will always turn to violence as a means of solving their problems. It seems that the majority of people around the world think the inspections are working and are encouraged by Iraq's improved (yet not complete) cooperation. Even if you're anti-war, you have to realize that Iraq's cooperation is most likely due to those 160,000+ U.S. troops standing at the Iraqi border. Could our military be powerful enough to get Iraq to disarm without firing a shot? Teddy Roosevelt's "big stick" is at it again...

I was a bit disappointed yesterday that following the reports from the U.N. weapons inspectors that the news coverage switched to analysis and commentary and not on all of the comments made thereafter. (Maybe I should have checked out C-SPAN...they probably had it.) Syria went first, and MSNBC was kind enough to put some captions with the picture to indicate what was being said, but none of the translation was heard. MSNBC indicated that the ambassador from Syria was talking about Israel's non-compliance with past U.N. resolutions, and given the problems in that part of the world I think it would have been interesting to hear his side of the story. People riding the fence often do so in an attempt to get the best view of both sides.

So even though I titled this post "Not-So-United Nations", don't think I don't like the process that was on display yesterday. The debate is a good one, and it could shape international diplomacy efforts for years to come. There has been quite a bit of talk about the Security Council's "power" and "relevancy" if they fail to "forcefully enforce" their resolutions, and maybe only time will tell how that will sort out. As pointed out on MSNBC's Hardball last night, the key player at this point may be Britain's Tony Blair - as a leader of a strong European country and the United States' greatest ally, he is in the best position to negotiate a compromise. I think highly of Blair as a world leader, and I hope he can pull it off, regardless of whether that means force is used or not. I really think the "United" in United Nations needs to mean something, just like it does in "United States of America". That doesn't always mean that decisions are made to please the majority, but it should mean that decisions are made together.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My heart is in Boulder but my brain is needed in Denver, so I'm putting my body in Broomfield

I wasn't really joking when I told people the university hands you an eviction notice with your diploma.

The university doesn't do this for everyone, of course, just those of us who live in student housing. I lived in Smiley Court for more than 9 years, longer than I've lived anywhere other than the house I grew up in. It was home, and home can be hard to leave.

Admittedly, the apartment had gotten a bit cramped. It was tight from the start, since I was downsizing from a two-bedroom apartment into a one-bedroom. Adding an extra bicycle and a few hundred books along the way didn't help. The apartment was also miserably hot in the summer, with south- and west-facing brick walls and a location on the top floor. Even with a small air conditioner wedged in the too-small windows, running all day, the temperatures could get over 85 degrees and stay that way past midnight. So it wasn't perfect. But then again, it had this view:

From this apartment I managed to turn myself …

Hibernation

It's the last half-hour of 2017 and I'm pushing out a post to keep my blogging streak alive. I can't imagine this is interesting to anyone else, but that's never really been what this blog is for. I could write more, and maybe I should write more, but the only goal I've had for this blog for a while is to write at least once a year.

The last week of the year has become what I call my period of "hibernation." Between Christmas and the New Year, I stay home, do whatever I want on whatever schedule I want. This year, that meant a lot of nights staying up until 4 am and sleeping until 10 or 11. Other than trips to get food, I pretty much had no social interaction for the week. I don't know that I purposely take this time as a mental vacation, but that's sort of what it is.
I had several goals for this year's hibernation, but the one I've done best to stick to is physical: pedaling my stationary bike 40 miles each day. There is a Strava challe…

Last.fm and Ten Years of Web 2.0

Ten years ago yesterday I scrobbled my first tracks to last.fm. What's scrobbling? On last.fm, scrobbling refers to automatic music track logging to the internet. For me, uploading a record of my music listening habits was my first real experience with "Web 2.0." Remember Web 2.0? It referred to websites of user-generated content that enabled virtual communities and interoperability. Now such sites are too ubiquitous on the web to warrant a special designation — they're just the web. But that wasn't true in 2006, and even though I'd been putting content on the internet since 1996, at the time it was enough to make me a little nervous. What did these strangers want with my data, and what was in it for me?

Ten years and 24,941 scrobbles later, I have my answer: I have a really cool record of all the music I've listened to the past 10 years! Well, not "all," technically: I've certainly listened to music in places and on devices that didn't …